Current flow through the tragus

A slice through the tragus with a stimulating electrode on each side. Each pulse drives current from one pad to the other through skin, subcutis and cartilage. Change the pulse, the pads or the skin contact and watch where the current goes, what voltage it takes, and which nerve fibres feel it.

Solving the field
Current density
  • Flow lines. Each carries an equal share of the current, so they bunch where it is dense.
  • Moving dots show the direction of current. Their drift is exaggerated to be visible.
  • Nerve fibres, drawn schematically. Orange where the pulse depolarises them, blue where it hyperpolarises.

One pulse on the oscilloscope

Drag across the trace to scrub through the pulse.

  • Current delivered
  • Voltage at the electrodes
  • Voltage across the skin barrier
  • Voltage limit of the stimulator

What this pulse does

Peak voltage at the electrodes
–

Charge per phase
–

Net charge per pulse
–

Current density under a pad
–

Tissue resistance between the pads
–

RMS current and average power
–

Where the voltage goes at its peak

    Where the current crosses

      Drive on the nerve fibres

      FibreStrongest depolarisation

      How this model works

      What you are looking at

      A slice across the tragus, the small flap in front of the ear canal, as if cut horizontally through the head. Skin wraps a thin layer of loose subcutis and a plate of cartilage that runs on into the face. The clip puts one pad on the outer face and one on the inner face, the way a tragus ear clip grips, so every pulse has to cross the tragus to get from one pad to the other.

      How the field is calculated

      The slice is divided into 0.1 mm squares, each given the conductivity of its tissue. The solver then finds the voltage everywhere such that no current is lost or created in any square, which is the same quasi-static approach used in finite-element models of ear stimulation. The default conductivities for skin (0.465 S/m) and cartilage (0.2 S/m) follow Kreisberg and colleagues; the subcutis value of 0.08 S/m is an assumption between their skin and fat values. The two-dimensional slice is extruded to the depth that gives each pad the area of a round pad of the chosen diameter.

      Two field patterns are solved. In the first, current enters evenly across each pad, which is what happens once the outer skin barrier has charged. In the second, the pad metal is one uniform voltage with only the gel in series, which is the situation for the first few microseconds of every change in current, when the barrier is uncharged and current crowds towards the rims of the pads. The display blends from the second pattern to the first with the barrier's charging time.

      The skin barrier and the stimulator

      The stratum corneum behaves like a resistor and a capacitor side by side, and most of the electrode voltage ends up across it rather than across the tissue. The stimulator is treated as a current source with a voltage limit. When the voltage needed goes past the limit, the current falls short. The barrier is still charged from the first phase when the second phase starts, which gives the second phase extra headroom, so a nominally symmetric pulse can deliver unequal charge and leave a small net DC current. The model assumes the stimulator has no DC-blocking capacitor and leaves the electrodes open between pulses; many devices do one or both, which would change this.

      Nerve fibres

      The gold lines are straight fibres at two depths on each face, placed schematically. Where the tissue voltage along a fibre curves upwards (a positive activating function), a fibre running there is pushed towards firing; where it curves downwards it is hyperpolarised. Whether a fibre actually fires also depends on its diameter, the pulse width and its true three-dimensional course, none of which is modelled. The optional contour marks where the field exceeds 6.15, 12.3 or 24.6 V/m, the nerve activation thresholds assumed by Kreisberg and colleagues.

      What it leaves out

      This is a two-dimensional sketch with smooth, uniform layers. Real skin carries much of its current through sweat ducts and hair follicles, tissue has capacitance of its own, and the gel and pad contact vary. How much of the tragus the vagus nerve supplies is also debated: the one dissection study usually cited for it reported the auricular branch of the vagus in under half of tragus specimens, and later authors have pointed out inconsistencies in how those results were reported. The model is for building intuition. It does not control or represent any particular stimulator and is not medical advice.

      Sources

      1. Kreisberg E, Esmaeilpour Z, Adair D, et al. High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimulation 2021;14(6):1419–1430. doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.001 (PubMed)
      2. Peuker ET, Filler TJ. The nerve supply of the human auricle. Clinical Anatomy 2002;15(1):35–37. doi.org/10.1002/ca.1089
      3. Butt MF, Albusoda A, Farmer AD, Aziz Q. The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. Journal of Anatomy 2020;236(4):588–611. PMC7083568
      4. Bermejo P, López M, Larraya I, et al. Innervation of the human cavum conchae and auditory canal: anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation. BioMed Research International 2017. PMC5371220
      5. Badran BW, Brown JC, Dowdle LT, et al. Tragus or cymba conchae? Investigating the anatomical foundation of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimulation 2018;11(4):947–948. PMC6607436

      Tragus current-flow simulator, version 1.3. An educational physics model: it is not connected to any device and is not medical advice.